From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Foster v. Morgenthau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 5, 1985
115 A.D.2d 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

December 5, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.).


Section 752 Jud. of the Judiciary Law provides that the mandate of commitment set forth the "particular circumstances" of the offense. The failure to comply with this statutory requirement renders the commitment totally defective. (Matter of Douglas v Adel, 269 N.Y. 144; Briddon v Briddon, 229 N.Y. 452.) Since the court herein did not specify the actions which the attorneys involved committed such as would support the finding of criminal contempt, the mandate of commitment is invalid.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Asch, Fein, Milonas and Rosenberger, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Foster v. Morgenthau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 5, 1985
115 A.D.2d 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Foster v. Morgenthau

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DANIEL P. FOSTER, P.C., Appellant, v. ROBERT M…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 5, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of O'Connell v. Taddeo

( See, People ex rel. Barnes v. Court of Sessions, 147 N.Y. 290.) Although proceedings are now…

Dreher v. Martinez

The only causes for which a person may be punished for a criminal contempt are the ones enumerated in this…