From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 1966
26 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

November 21, 1966


MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT. The awards rest solely on proof of reproduction cost less depreciation, without any indication that either property was unique or a specialty ( Guthmuller v. State of New York, 23 A.D.2d 597). Determinations thus bottomed on erroneous principles of law must, of course, be rejected ( Matter of Huie [ Fletcher], 2 N.Y.2d 168, 171). Orders reversed, on the law and the facts, and cases remanded to Special Term for remittal to a new commission for rehearing and determination, without costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur; Taylor, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Matter of Ford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 1966
26 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Matter of Ford

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ARTHUR C. FORD et al., Constituting the Board of Water…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)