From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Foerg v. Sackett Wilhelms Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 20, 1937
249 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

January 20, 1937.

Appeal from Industrial Board.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


Claimant alleges that he sustained an injury to his eye about December 2, 1930, while in the regular course of his employment. No claim for compensation was filed by claimant until June 3, 1935. The Industrial Board denied compensation because the claim was not filed within the statutory time. No appeal was taken from that decision. No appeal lies from a decision of the State Industrial Board denying an application to reopen a case for the purpose of introducing further testimony. Such a decision is merely interlocutory. ( Matter of Sparone v. General Electric Co., 203 App. Div. 273; Matter of Mittiga v. U.S. Aluminum Co., 227 id. 680.) Appeal dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Foerg v. Sackett Wilhelms Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 20, 1937
249 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Matter of Foerg v. Sackett Wilhelms Corporation

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of PETER FOERG, Appellant, against SACKETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 20, 1937

Citations

249 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Einbinder

A further question is whether the discretionary denial of an application for reconsideration under § 22 is…

Matter of Schwartz v. Bernie's Tire Battery

Appeal from State Industrial Board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board, on the…