From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Flynn v. Board of Trustees of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 1994
201 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 28, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that when there is a tie vote of the Board of Trustees of the New York City Fire Department in determining whether accident disability retirement is appropriate (see, Matter of City of New York v. Schoeck, 294 N.Y. 559, 568), "the Board's decision can be set aside on judicial review only if it can be determined as a matter of law on the record that the disability was the natural and proximate result of a service related accident" (Matter of Causarano v. Board of Trustees, 178 A.D.2d 474; see, Matter of Canfora v. Board of Trustees, 60 N.Y.2d 347). The petitioner has the burden of establishing that, as a matter of law, a causal relationship exists between the service-related accident and the claimed disability (see, Matter of Nicolosi v. Board of Trustees, 198 A.D.2d 282). It is only when circumstances admit but one inference that the court may decide as a matter of law what inference should be drawn (see, Matter of Radigan v. O'Connell, 304 N.Y. 396, 397). Moreover, "[n]ot every line of duty injury will result in an award of accident disability. The injury must be the result of a `"sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact"'" (Matter of McCambridge v. McGuire, 62 N.Y.2d 563, 567-568, quoting from Matter of Lichtenstein v. Board of Trustees, 57 N.Y.2d 1010, 1012).

Applying these most rigorous standards to the facts of the instant matter, we are constrained to agree with the conclusion of the Supreme Court that the petitioner, a courageous and dedicated firefighter for approximately 30 years, has not established, as a matter of law, that his physical disabilities were the result of line-of-duty accidents. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Trustees denying the petitioner's applications for a line-of-duty accident disability pension was not arbitrary or capricious (see, Matter of Nicolosi v. Board of Trustees, supra; Matter of Bartsch v. Board of Trustees, 142 A.D.2d 577). Bracken, J.P., Miller, O'Brien and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Flynn v. Board of Trustees of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 1994
201 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Flynn v. Board of Trustees of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MELVILLE F. FLYNN, Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 28, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 305

Citing Cases

Matter of Hodges v. Board of Trustees

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the determination of the Board of Trustees is…

Mtr. of Massari v. Bd., Trustees of N.Y. City

The petitioner then commenced this proceeding, and the Supreme Court determined that he had not sustained his…