From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Floreza Realty Corp. v. Miele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1998
249 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 13, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

We agree with appellants that the Supreme Court improperly "abolished" the interest payments charged to the petitioner for delinquent real property taxes on the subject property. The petitioner does not dispute that it was improperly credited with having made certain tax payments on the subject property when tax payments meant for other parcels were credited to the subject property. Thus, the appellants were entitled to charge interest on the late tax payments ( see, Administrative Code of City of N Y § 11-224 [f]).

O'Brien, J.P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Floreza Realty Corp. v. Miele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1998
249 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Floreza Realty Corp. v. Miele

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FLOREZA REALTY CORP., Respondent, v. JOEL MIELE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 797