From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Flink v. Town of Mamaroneck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1987
129 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

April 6, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Colabella at Special Term.

We add that contrary to the appellants' claim, Special Term did not rely on any material not contained in the record (CPLR 7804 [e]). Further, the appellants, having issued the notices of violation and disapproval under the name of the "Building Department", are estopped from asserting lack of jurisdiction here on the ground that the Building Department was not formally constituted (31 CJS, Estoppel, §§ 123, 124; cf., Bender v New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 38 N.Y.2d 662; State ex rel. Anaya v McBride, 88 N.M. 244, 539 P.2d 1006, 1011). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Flink v. Town of Mamaroneck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1987
129 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Flink v. Town of Mamaroneck

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LAWRENCE J. FLINK et al., Respondents, v. TOWN OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 6, 1987

Citations

129 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Indeck-Corinth Ltd. P'ship v. Assessor for the Town of Corinth

"[J]udicial estoppel precludes a party from taking a position in one legal proceeding which is contrary to…

Indeck-Corinth Ltd. P'ship v. Assessor for the Town of Corinth

"[J]udicial estoppel precludes a party from taking a position in one legal proceeding which is contrary to…