From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Fiore v. Hecht

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 8, 1971
274 N.E.2d 443 (N.Y. 1971)

Opinion

Argued September 7, 1971

Decided September 8, 1971

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, EDWARD M. O'GORMAN, J.

Robert L. Ostertag for appellant.

Louie O. Fiore and Ann B. Rupsis, respondents, pro se. William V. Welch, County Attorney ( Joseph D. Quinn, Jr. of counsel), for Albert L. Hecht and Robert E. Stevens, Commissioners of Elections of Dutchess County, respondents.

Albert L. Hecht, respondent in person.


Order reversed, without costs, on the opinion at Special Term and the judgment of Supreme Court, Dutchess County, reinstated.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, JASEN and GIBSON. Judges SCILEPPI and BREITEL dissent and vote to affirm on the ground that the cancellation of the second registration left the respondent Economou without any registration or enrollment outstanding and the subsequent registration would not be effective to reinstate his enrollment until one week after the general election of 1971 under the Election Law. Taking no part: Judge BERGAN.


Summaries of

Matter of Fiore v. Hecht

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 8, 1971
274 N.E.2d 443 (N.Y. 1971)
Case details for

Matter of Fiore v. Hecht

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LOUIE O. FIORE et al., Respondents, v. ALBERT L. HECHT et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 8, 1971

Citations

274 N.E.2d 443 (N.Y. 1971)
274 N.E.2d 443
324 N.Y.S.2d 953