From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Figueroa v. Howmar Novelty Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 10, 1959
9 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

December 10, 1959

Present — Foster, P.J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.


Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board which held that claimant's eye condition subsequent to March 14, 1955 was not causally related to the accident of January 5, 1955 found by the board to have occurred when a fragment of rhinestone upon which claimant was working chipped off and lodged in her right eye, causing kerato-conjunctivitis. The case presents no more than a conflict of medical opinion evidence which the board was entitled to resolve against the claimant. There was proof that on or prior to the date in question the "mild" conjunctivitis was not disabling. There was evidence that claimant also suffered from a blepharospasm but there was ample medical proof that this condition (a closing of the eyelid) was voluntary and, indeed, that claimant was malingering. There also existed a cortical cataract but again the evidence warranted the board's denial of causation. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Figueroa v. Howmar Novelty Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 10, 1959
9 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

Matter of Figueroa v. Howmar Novelty Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JULIA FIGUEROA, Appellant, against HOWMAR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1959

Citations

9 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)