From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ferraro v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1990
166 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 1, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.).


Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the application for attorney's fees is denied.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, we find that the Supreme Court improperly granted his request for attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The petitioner's cause of action, essentially to compel prompt compliance with a decision after a hearing, was not a bona fide civil rights cause of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (see, Matter of Rashid v. Perales, 156 A.D.2d 692; see also, Matter of Ehrman v. Perales, 162 A.D.2d 598; Matter of Middleton v. Perales, 160 A.D.2d 800). Kooper, J.P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Ferraro v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1990
166 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Ferraro v. Perales

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NICHOLAS FERRARO, Respondent-Appellant, v. CESAR A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

Matter of Riley v. Dowling

In addition, the court properly denied the petitioner's application for attorney's fees pursuant to the Civil…

Matter of Cuevas v. Perales

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied her request for attorney's fees…