Opinion
February 15, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The court properly dismissed the proceeding on the ground that the appellants did not have standing to bring it (see, Matter of Sgambati v. New York City Bd. of Elections, 224 A.D.2d 564 [decided herewith]). In addition, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying a motion to amend the petition to allege that the appellants have standing as "aggrieved candidates" (see, Felix v. Lettre, 204 A.D.2d 679).
In light of our determination, we need not reach the parties' remaining contentions. Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Santucci, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.