From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Farone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 21, 1990
162 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

June 21, 1990

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court of Otsego County (Kepner, Jr., S.).


Decedent died testate December 20, 1980. His wife, Angela Farone, was appointed executrix and, following her death, petitioner was appointed successor executor on February 20, 1982. At the time of his death, decedent owned 50 shares of La Monica Beverages, Inc. common stock. The estate had entered into negotiations for the sale of the La Monica Beverages stock prior to petitioner's appointment, eventually contracting for its sale to Frank La Monica for $800,000. Petitioner concedes that because he previously represented both La Monica Beverages and Frank La Monica, the sale of the stock was negotiated without his assistance by a consortium of attorneys representing estate beneficiaries. Thereafter, petitioner petitioned for and obtained approval of the sale and prepared and executed the necessary closing documents consummating the transaction. It is beyond dispute that petitioner received the stock and paid out the proceeds from the sale of the stock to the beneficiaries.

On July 23, 1986, petitioner filed his final account, together with a petition for its approval. Surrogate's Court sustained the objections of respondent Magdeline Farone to the extent of determining that although "[t]here is no evidence of misconduct which would cause an adjustment of the successor executor's commission", petitioner was not entitled to receiving commissions on the value of the La Monica Beverages stock because he did not negotiate its sale. Petitioner now appeals.

It is well established, in view of the mandatory language of SCPA 2307, that "in the absence of mathematical error in the computation of commissions or allegations of fiduciary misconduct", Surrogate's Court must award executor's commissions (Matter of Reohr, 71 A.D.2d 161, 162; see, Matter of Gall, 107 App. Div. 310, 311; 29 Carmody-Wait 2d, N Y Prac § 168:4, at 534). Indeed, put another way, the denial of commissions is not within the discretion of Surrogate's Court unless the fiduciary is "derelict in the performance of his or her duties" (Matter of Smith, 91 A.D.2d 789, 791), guilty of "complete indifference" (Matter of Schaich, 55 A.D.2d 914, 915, lv denied 42 N.Y.2d 802) or "otherwise acts improperly" (Matter of Campbell, 138 A.D.2d 827, 828). The finding of Surrogate's Court that petitioner was not guilty of misconduct is amply supported by the record and, therefore, the objections should have been dismissed.

Order modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as partially granted respondent Magdeline Farone's objections and denied petitioner receiving commissions on the proceeds of the sale of the stock of La Monica Beverages, Inc.; objections dismissed; and, as so modified, affirmed. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Farone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 21, 1990
162 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Farone

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of ALBERT E. FARONE, Deceased. PHILIP J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 21, 1990

Citations

162 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
557 N.Y.S.2d 849

Citing Cases

Matter of Richmond

The law is also clear that a successor fiduciary is entitled to full commissions on all assets actually…

Matter of Gottlieb

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting so much of the first decretal paragraph as adhered to the…