From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Farley v. Sage

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 14, 1916
112 N.E. 1058 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued February 25, 1916

Decided March 14, 1916

David E. Powers for appellants.

Louis M. King and A.M. Sperry for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs. The errors in the admission of evidence are disregarded as not affecting the substantial rights of the defendants (Code Civ. Pro. § 1317); no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, SEABURY and POUND, JJ. Dissenting: CARDOZO, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Farley v. Sage

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 14, 1916
112 N.E. 1058 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Matter of Farley v. Sage

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Petition of WILLIAM W. FARLEY, as State Commissioner…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 14, 1916

Citations

112 N.E. 1058 (N.Y. 1916)
112 N.E. 1058

Citing Cases

Matter of Farley v. Sage

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 217 N.Y. 684.)…