From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Farfaglia v. Loveall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1127 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 22, 1995

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Balio, JJ.


Motion for summary reversal and a new trial denied with leave to renew. Memorandum: Although a transcript of the proceedings before the Hearing Examiner is unavailable, the Hearing Examiner made detailed findings of fact. It is unclear whether respondent wishes to challenge the findings of fact or the conclusions of law on this appeal. Because respondent has failed to raise an issue that the testimony failed to support the findings of fact, the motion is denied with leave to renew upon a showing that a transcript of the proceedings is necessary to a determination of the appeal and that there are no alternative means to reconstruct the record without such transcript.


Summaries of

Matter of Farfaglia v. Loveall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1127 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Farfaglia v. Loveall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARGARET FARFAGLIA, Respondent, v. CLEATUS B. LOVEALL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 1127 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 702

Citing Cases

Matter of Stewart v. Soda

Motion insofar as it seeks summary reversal denied and insofar as it seeks extension of time to perfect…