Opinion
May 21, 2001.
Shlimbaum, Shlimbaum and Jablonski, Islip, N.Y. (Lark J. Shlimbaum of counsel), for appellant.
Vincent J. Messina, Jr., Islip, N.Y. (Richard Hoffmann of counsel), for respondents.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the petitioner did not put forth sufficient evidence of a change of circumstances or new facts that were not available at the time of her 1984 application for a zoning variance. Therefore, her 1999 application for a new hearing on the proposed variance for the subject property was properly denied (see, Pettit v. Board of Appeals of Town of Islip, 160 A.D.2d 1006; Matter of Ireland v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Queensbury, 195 A.D.2d 155, 159).
KRAUSMAN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, FEUERSTEIN and SMITH, JJ., concur.