From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eve v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Aug 23, 1974
45 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

August 23, 1974

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Marsh, P.J., Witmer, Moule, Mahoney and Goldman, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The Justice at Special Term who saw and heard the witnesses was in the best position to judge their credibility. We agree with his finding that there was no evidence of fraud or intentional wrongdoing on the part of respondent Hill. "We are required (Election Law, § 330) to construe liberally the Election Law to the end that the voters be afforded the fullest opportunity to exercise their franchise" ( Matter of Jones v. Gallo, 37 A.D.2d 793, 794). Bearing this principle in mind, and recognizing the broad powers granted to the Supreme Court to make such orders as fairness and justice require in election cases ( Matter of Rosen v. McNab, 25 N.Y.2d 798, 799), we concur in Special Term's denial of the petition and also in the memorandum at Special Term, Stiller, J.


Summaries of

Eve v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Aug 23, 1974
45 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Eve v. Mahoney

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ARTHUR O. EVE, Appellant, v. EDWARD K. MAHONEY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Aug 23, 1974

Citations

45 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)