Opinion
May 21, 1987
In 1979, petitioner was convicted in Maryland of the crime of petty theft. This conviction related to certain financial irregularities at a nursing home owned by petitioner in that State. He received a suspended sentence, three years of probation and was required to perform 300 hours of community service. The Maryland Commission of Medical Discipline reprimanded petitioner and placed him on probation.
Before the Maryland Commission acted, petitioner relocated to New York, where he had previously been licensed to practice medicine. He advised respondent State Education Department of his Maryland misdemeanor conviction. Thereafter, petitioner was charged with professional misconduct under Education Law § 6509 (5) (a) (iii). The hearing committee of the State Board for Professional Medical Conduct sustained the charges of professional misconduct, but recommended that no penalty be imposed. The Commissioner of Health, however, recommended that petitioner be suspended for three years, that the suspension be stayed and that petitioner be fined $500. This is the sanction ultimately imposed by the Commissioner of Education.
The sole issue for our consideration is whether this sanction is too harsh. In this regard, we note that our power to review a sanction imposed in an administrative proceeding is strictly limited, and we may interfere with imposition of a sanction only where the punishment is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (Matter of Alaimo v Ambach, 91 A.D.2d 695, lv denied 58 N.Y.2d 607; see, Matter of Purdy v. Kreisberg, 47 N.Y.2d 354, 360; Matter of Kay v. Board of Regents, 108 A.D.2d 1039). We do not find the penalty imposed here to be shocking to one's sense of fairness. Although the hearing committee noted several mitigating factors in petitioner's favor, the fact remains that petitioner was convicted of a crime and, as the Commissioner of Health noted, petitioner left Maryland before that State's Commission of Medical Discipline imposed a penalty on him. Accordingly, the Commissioner of Education's determination should be confirmed.
Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Main, J.P., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.