Nor were there any findings regarding any representations made by the Debtors to Plaintiffs Garland Necaise and/or Game Necaise. Moreover, fraud was alleged in the Chancery Court action; however, the Chancellor did not make any specific findings of fraud.See In re Estate of Vick, 557 So. 2d 760, 767 (Miss. 1989) (discussing distinctions between fraud and undue influence; a finding of "undue influence need not involve the use of false and fraudulent representations or untrue statements"). The Chancery Court judgment is insufficient to establish the elements of ยง 523(a)(2)(A); therefore, summary judgment should be denied as it relates to this claim.