From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of England

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 6, 1976
345 N.E.2d 589 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued November 26, 1975

Decided January 6, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Irving Jorrisch, Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Murray Sylvester of counsel), for appellant.

James J. Duggan for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Employment, for purposes of determining employer liability for contributions to the unemployment insurance fund, is defined as "any service under any contract of employment for hire, express or implied, written or oral". (Labor Law, § 511, subd 1, par [a].) Whether a given relationship is to be classified as employer-employee or as customer-independent contractor is basically a question of fact to be decided by the agency charged with the responsibility for administering the unemployment insurance statutes. (See, e.g., Matter of Basin St. [Lubin], 6 N.Y.2d 276; Matter of Frattallone [Victor Addressing Corp. — Levine], 39 A.D.2d 984.) A decision as to existence of an employment relationship made by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board is conclusive if it is supported by substantial evidence in the record. (Labor Law, § 623; Matter of Green [Republic Steel Corp. — Levine], 37 N.Y.2d 554; Matter of Fisher [Levine], 36 N.Y.2d 146, 150.) In this case, the administrative finding that the petitioner's arrangement with its reporters and typists constituted an employment relationship was supported by substantial evidence. It was error, therefore, for the Appellate Division to substitute its judgment for that of the administrative officials directly responsible for the administration of the State labor laws, even if the record might also have sustained a contrary interpretation. (Matter of Green [Republic Steel Corp. — Levine], supra.)

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reinstated.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order reversed, without costs, and the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reinstated in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of England

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 6, 1976
345 N.E.2d 589 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of England

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of FRANCES L. ENGLAND, Doing Business as POST…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 6, 1976

Citations

345 N.E.2d 589 (N.Y. 1976)
345 N.E.2d 589
382 N.Y.S.2d 46

Citing Cases

Matter of Williman

They are given no training; may and sometimes do work for others; are free to reject tapes without penalty;…

Matter of Westchester Reporting Service, Inc.

(Matter of Frattalone [Victor Addressing Corp. — Levine], 39 A.D.2d 984.) However, an administrative finding…