Opinion
May 30, 1995
Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Martinez-Perez, J.).
Ordered that the orders of disposition are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Under the circumstances of this case, the evidence at the hearing was sufficient to justify a finding that the appellant had violated certain conditions of the adjournment in contemplation of dismissal order and the procedure followed by the court satisfied due process requirements (see, Morrissey v Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 481).
Therefore, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in vacating the adjournment in contemplation of dismissal order and restoring the matter to the calendar for disposition (see, Family Ct Act § 315.3). Balletta, J.P., O'Brien, Thompson and Altman, JJ., concur.