From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MATTER OF EDWARD v. FIFI N

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 1992
184 A.D.2d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 9, 1992

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Bruce M. Kaplan, J.).


After a hearing in Family Court at which both petitioner and respondent appeared and stated petitioner was the subject child's father, an order of filiation was entered in his favor. Thereafter, the court refused respondent's request to vacate the order of filiation and no appeal was taken. Appellant, the maternal grandmother and foster mother, has no standing to challenge this determination.

As a foster parent granted intervenor status, appellant's status as a party entitles her to participate only in those aspects of the hearing pertaining to custody with respect to the best interests of the child. Clearly, the best interests of the child require that custody remain with the petitioner father.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

MATTER OF EDWARD v. FIFI N

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 1992
184 A.D.2d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

MATTER OF EDWARD v. FIFI N

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWARD T., Respondent, v. FIFI N., Respondent. ANN D.N.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
584 N.Y.S.2d 820

Citing Cases

Hyper Bicycles, Inc. v. Acctel, Ltd.

The subsequent contract, however, must pertain to "precisely the same subject matter" as the prior contract.…

Vigilant Ins. Co. v. Singer

However, a subsequent contract not pertaining to "precisely the same subject matter" will not supersede an…