From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Edelmuth v. Prendergast

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 13, 1911
95 N.E. 804 (N.Y. 1911)

Opinion

Argued May 30, 1911

Decided June 13, 1911

Benjamin Trapnell and Joseph A. Flannery for appellant.

Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel ( Joel J. Squier and George E. Draper of counsel), for respondent.


The award to the relator did not bear interest until after a demand made on the comptroller for its payment. The appeal from the order of confirmation did not stay relator's right to make such demand, but the demand made on July 10, 1910, was, in our opinion sufficient. Therefore, the relator is entitled to interest on the award from thirty days after that date until the award be paid.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and that of Special Term modified, so as to direct that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue directed to the respondent commanding him to pay the award made to the relator, with interest from August 10, 1910, until the date of payment thereof, without costs to either party in any court.

CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Edelmuth v. Prendergast

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 13, 1911
95 N.E. 804 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for

Matter of Edelmuth v. Prendergast

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of HENRY EDELMUTH, as Executor of ADOLPH…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 13, 1911

Citations

95 N.E. 804 (N.Y. 1911)
95 N.E. 804

Citing Cases

Matter of Starr

Until this step has been completed, the property owner is not entitled to payment of his award, and the…

Matter of Minzesheimer v. Prendergast

A uniform rule for the assessment of damages makes it desirable that, so far as it is not specifically…