From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ecker v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 31, 1933
239 App. Div. 145 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

October 31, 1933.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

John F.X. Finn of counsel, for the appellant Edward A. Neylan.

John T. Dooling of counsel, for the respondent Samuel Ecker.

Russell Lord Tarbox of counsel, for the respondent the Board of Elections of the City of New York.

Present — FINCH, P.J., MARTIN, O'MALLEY, TOWNLEY and GLENNON, JJ.


The court erroneously placed on the appellant Neylan the burden of establishing the genuineness of the signatures appearing upon the petition. The court also denied the appellant a reasonable opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses produced by the petitioners.

These errors are so fundamental as to require that the order appealed from should be reversed and the motion denied.


Order reversed and petitioner's motion denied.


Summaries of

Matter of Ecker v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 31, 1933
239 App. Div. 145 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Matter of Ecker v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of SAMUEL ECKER, Petitioner, against S…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1933

Citations

239 App. Div. 145 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
267 N.Y.S. 159

Citing Cases

Matter of Vukelic

The petitioner Vukelic (herein referred to as "petitioner") has the burden of proof. ( Matter of Ecker v.…

Matter of Mirrington v. Vandemark

The burden is on the objectant to prove invalidity of signatures. ( Matter of Ecker v. Cohen, 239 App. Div.…