Opinion
November 24, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.
Petitioner was charged with providing legal assistance without prior approval of the Superintendent or designee in violation of inmate rule 180.17 ( 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [26] [vii]). Contrary to respondent's assertion, the record before us fails to support the Hearing Officer's finding that the legal assistance provided by petitioner was unauthorized. Although the testimony at the tier III disciplinary hearing plainly established that petitioner did indeed render legal assistance to certain inmates, neither the misbehavior report filed in connection with the disciplinary proceeding nor the sworn testimony before the Hearing Officer demonstrated that the services provided by petitioner were in violation of the cited rule, and we are unwilling to simply assume that petitioner's services were in fact unauthorized. Because the challenged determination is not supported by substantial evidence, respondent is directed to expunge all references to this proceeding (see, Matter of Grimmett v Riley, 192 A.D.2d 831). In light of our conclusion on this point, we need not address the remaining arguments advanced by petitioner.
Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted, and respondent is directed to expunge all references to this proceeding from petitioner's records and to restore petitioner to his prehearing status.