From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dutchess County Chapter, Dutchess County

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1981
426 N.E.2d 488 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Decided July 7, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOSEPH D. QUINN, JR., J.

Stephen J. Wing, County Attorney (Ian G. MacDonald of counsel), for appellants.

Michael J. Smith and Thomas D. Mahar, Jr., for respondent.


On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. Public policy does not preclude a Sheriff from agreeing to submit for resolution by arbitration questions as to whether assignments to a Deputy Sheriff violate provisions of their collective bargaining agreement concerning out-of-title work assignments. That being so the award of the arbitrator, involving an interpretation of a job description and not the creation or classification of a new position, does not offend public policy. In addition, we cannot say as a matter of law that the award is so irrational as to warrant vacatur.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Matter of Dutchess County Chapter, Dutchess County

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1981
426 N.E.2d 488 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

Matter of Dutchess County Chapter, Dutchess County

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between DUTCHESS COUNTY CHAPTER, CIVIL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 1981

Citations

426 N.E.2d 488 (N.Y. 1981)
426 N.E.2d 488
442 N.Y.S.2d 994

Citing Cases

Town of Brookhaven v. Civil Serv. Employees

The respondent has failed to indicate the existence of any such law, rule or regulation. Notwithstanding the…

Matter of Copaigue Un. Free Sch. v. Local 852

A grievance is defined as a complaint by an employee based on an alleged violation of the provisions of this…