From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Durdaller v. Liberty Products Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 4, 1962
16 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Summary

In Matter of Durdaller v. Liberty Prods. Corp. (16 A.D.2d 849, affd. 12 N.Y.2d 787) we reversed a decision discharging the Special Fund and stated that where a claimant suffered from obesity, the condition was obvious and that the employer knew the condition was due to disease since there was a pre-employment physical examination.

Summary of this case from Matter of Szmania v. Ford Motor Company

Opinion

May 4, 1962


Appeal from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board. Claimant is suffering from a glandular disease which results in extreme obesity. His weight is at least 375 pounds, and a physician who examined him and who was unable to weigh him on his office scale, estimated the weight to be about 500 pounds. The extreme obesity itself was obvious and the employer knew when claimant was hired that the obesity was due to the disease since there had been a pre-employment physical examination. Claimant was put to work preparing airplane parts for painting, a job for which it was difficult to find workmen. This situation presents a classical illustration of the kind of physically handicapped employee whose employment was to be encouraged by subdivision 8 of section 15 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law and the fund set up by the statute. The proof is that the glandular condition was permanent. There can be no doubt that its result in extreme obesity was likely to hinder employment and it was conceded by the Fund in the record that the injury sustained is greater than would normally result from the industrial accident. ( Matter of Ferguson v. Art Stone Co., 6 A.D.2d 25.) The decision of the board discharging the Special Fund because the claimant's handicap was "not considered to be disabling" is without substantial evidence in its support. Decision discharging the Special Fund reversed and claim remitted to the board, with costs to appellant against the Special Fund. Bergan, P.J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Durdaller v. Liberty Products Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 4, 1962
16 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

In Matter of Durdaller v. Liberty Prods. Corp. (16 A.D.2d 849, affd. 12 N.Y.2d 787) we reversed a decision discharging the Special Fund and stated that where a claimant suffered from obesity, the condition was obvious and that the employer knew the condition was due to disease since there was a pre-employment physical examination.

Summary of this case from Matter of Szmania v. Ford Motor Company
Case details for

Matter of Durdaller v. Liberty Products Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of GEORGE DURDALLER, Respondent, v. LIBERTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 4, 1962

Citations

16 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Saletta v. Allegheny Steel

Clearly, in these circumstances, the Special Fund would be liable to pay the compensation following the 104th…

Matter of Szmania v. Ford Motor Company

The majority is affirming the board's finding that the proof is not within the framework and purview of…