From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dunst v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 11, 1941
36 N.E.2d 913 (N.Y. 1941)

Opinion

Argued September 11, 1941

Decided September 11, 1941

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, COHALAN, J.

Benjamin S. Kassen, Mortimer E. Greif, Sidney Gold and Edward L. Josowitz for appellant.

John T. Dooling, Sol H. Eisler and Louis Dunst for respondent.


Order of Appellate Division reversed and order of Special Term affirmed, without costs. The affidavit upon the blank furnished by the Board of Elections, though not the best form of affidavit, constitutes compliance with the provisions of section 139 of the Election Law. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ. Dissent: RIPPEY, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Dunst v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 11, 1941
36 N.E.2d 913 (N.Y. 1941)
Case details for

Matter of Dunst v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LOUIS DUNST, Respondent, against S. HOWARD COHEN et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 11, 1941

Citations

36 N.E.2d 913 (N.Y. 1941)
36 N.E.2d 913