From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dumpson v. McClellan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 11, 1997
242 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 11, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Chemung County (Ellison, J.).


Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit smuggling, possession of a weapon, possession of contraband and unauthorized possession of money. Initially, we reject petitioner's contention that he was denied effective employee assistance. At the commencement of the hearing, petitioner was provided with all of the relevant and available documents which he could not access on his own ( see, Matter of Llull v. Coombe, 238 A.D.2d 761, 762, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 804). Moreover, he has failed to demonstrate that any prejudice resulted from such assistance ( see, Matter of Williams v. Coombe, 227 A.D.2d 756). Furthermore, the record fails to support petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer was biased ( see, Matter of Flynn v. Coombe, 239 A.D.2d 725, 726). Limiting petitioner's questions and evidence to matters that were relevant, and finding certain witnesses more credible than others, does not indicate bias ( see, Matter of Lee v. McCoy, 233 A.D.2d 633). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be unpreserved or without merit.

Mikoll, J.P., Casey, Yesawich Jr., Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Dumpson v. McClellan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 11, 1997
242 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Dumpson v. McClellan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TIMOTHY DUMPSON, Appellant, v. ROBERT J. McCLELLAN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 11, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 1016

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Annucci

Moreover, it has been held that the mere fact that a hearing officer ruled against an inmate was insufficient…

Matter of Eckert v. Selsky

The record discloses that the assistant conducted a thorough investigation interviewing those witnesses…