From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Drislane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. Extraordinary Term
Oct 22, 1936
248 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

October 22, 1936.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Albany County.

Present — Rhodes, Acting P.J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ. [See post, p. 938.]


In the case of Matter of Gruskin [ ante, p. 936], decided herewith, it was conceded upon the argument and held by this court that there were not sufficient valid signatures for the nominations of "The Union Party" in the county of Putnam, and again the same fact was conceded on this argument. In the counties of Rockland, Schuyler and Chemung a question of fact was raised by the evidence whether there was a sufficient number of valid signatures for those counties respectively, and the Special Term has held on the evidence that the number in each of those counties was insufficient under sections 135 and 137 of the Election Law. The evidence justified the finding of the Special Term. Order unanimously affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Drislane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. Extraordinary Term
Oct 22, 1936
248 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Matter of Drislane

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of WILLIAM E. DRISLANE and ORVIS A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. Extraordinary Term

Date published: Oct 22, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)