From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Driscoll v. Henry Gillen Sons Lighterage

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 11, 1919
123 N.E. 863 (N.Y. 1919)

Opinion

Argued February 25, 1919

Decided March 11, 1919

E.C. Sherwood, William B. Davis and Amos H. Stephens for appellants.

Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CHASE, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and CRANE, JJ. Dissenting: HISCOCK, Ch. J., COLLIN and McLAUGHLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Driscoll v. Henry Gillen Sons Lighterage

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 11, 1919
123 N.E. 863 (N.Y. 1919)
Case details for

Matter of Driscoll v. Henry Gillen Sons Lighterage

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARY DRISCOLL against HENRY GILLEN SONS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 11, 1919

Citations

123 N.E. 863 (N.Y. 1919)
123 N.E. 863

Citing Cases

Bodie v. New York Queens Elec. Light Power Co.

One of the defenses established is that defendant had secured to its employees, including plaintiff,…

Turner v. City of New York

The pier was a way or means furnished by the defendant to enable the plaintiff to have access to the ferry…