From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Douglas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1992
188 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 1, 1992

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Bruce M. Kaplan, J.).


The record reveals clear and convincing proof that respondent is presently and for the foreseeable future unable by reason of mental illness to provide proper and adequate care for her child (Matter of Nereida S., 57 N.Y.2d 636, 640), namely, medical records tracing the course of a decade-long illness necessitating 15 hospitalizations and unimpeached expert testimony. Where, as here, respondent-parent has a long history of mental illness with repeated hospitalizations and a deteriorating condition, "[t]here must be an affirmative conclusion" that it is possible that she will not only be free of mental illness but also will provide proper and adequate care for the child (Matter of Vera T., 80 A.D.2d 511, affd 55 N.Y.2d 1028). No such proof was offered by respondent.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Douglas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1992
188 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Douglas

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHUCKIE DOUGLAS M., a Child Alleged to be the Child of a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
590 N.Y.S.2d 446

Citing Cases

In re Marie

Before: Murphy, P.J., Wallach, Rubin and Williams, JJ. The evidence is clear and convincing that respondent…

In re the Guardianship of Luisa Lara M.

Before: Wallach, J.P., Rubin, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ. The evidence is clear and convincing that…