From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dorsey v. Cohen

Supreme Court, New York County
Aug 29, 1935
156 Misc. 792 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1935)

Opinion

August 29, 1935.

Thomas A. McGrath, for the petitioner.

Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel, for the Board of Elections.

Arthur G. Syran, for James P. Ryan.



The provisions of section 135 of the Election Law, added by chapter 955 of the Laws of 1935, requiring a statement showing when and where the subscribing witness was last registered, is a substantial amendment. Its efficacy to prevent fraud is not a matter for the court's consideration. It must be complied with, along with other formal requirements of law. Non-compliance therewith justifies the action which the board of elections has taken. Motion denied. Settle order on one day's notice.


Summaries of

Matter of Dorsey v. Cohen

Supreme Court, New York County
Aug 29, 1935
156 Misc. 792 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1935)
Case details for

Matter of Dorsey v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of THOMAS J. DORSEY, Petitioner, for a…

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: Aug 29, 1935

Citations

156 Misc. 792 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1935)
282 N.Y.S. 792

Citing Cases

People v. McManus

Some of the requirements provided for in these forms are mandatory and a failure strictly to comply therewith…

MATTER OF GOLDSTEIN v. Fenton

The subscribing witness who signed and swore to the authentication clauses attached to the petition is the…