From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dorfman v. Meisser

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County
Jun 3, 1968
56 Misc. 2d 890 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1968)

Opinion

June 3, 1968

Samuel Millman and Arthur D. Goldstein for petitioner.

Morris H. Schneider, County Attorney, for respondents.


Upon the foregoing papers it is ordered that this application for an order invalidating the petitions of the designee of the Democratic party for that party's nomination for the office of District Attorney of Nassau County is denied.

The authorization for the designation by the party of an individual not enrolled as a member of the party must be made in accordance with the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 137 of the Election Law. Here the authorization was made by the party's county executive committee. The certificate of authorization specifically refers to subdivision 4 of section 137, thus giving recognition to the fact that the authorization is being given to a person other than an enrolled member of the party. The by-laws of the Nassau County Democratic Committee (art. VII, § 2) provide that the authority conferred by Election Law may in an appropriate situation be exercised by a majority vote of the county executive committee. Thus the statute has been complied with and the petition is dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Dorfman v. Meisser

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County
Jun 3, 1968
56 Misc. 2d 890 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1968)
Case details for

Matter of Dorfman v. Meisser

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALVIN DORFMAN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM D. MEISSER et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County

Date published: Jun 3, 1968

Citations

56 Misc. 2d 890 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1968)
290 N.Y.S.2d 852

Citing Cases

Matter of Dorfman v. Meisser

Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Leave is granted to appellant to appeal to the Court of…