From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Donohue v. Huie

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1941
33 N.E.2d 241 (N.Y. 1941)

Opinion

Argued January 21, 1941

Decided February 27, 1941

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, LEVY, J.

Irving H. Saypol and Leo Kotler for appellant.

William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel ( Stanley Buchsbaum, Robert H. Schaffer and George G. Gallantz of counsel), for Irving V.A. Huie, as Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, et al., respondents.

James B.M. McNally and Samuel Rudykoff for Eugene D. Grun, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.


Summaries of

Donohue v. Huie

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1941
33 N.E.2d 241 (N.Y. 1941)
Case details for

Donohue v. Huie

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL DONOHUE, Appellant, against IRVING V.A. HUIE, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 27, 1941

Citations

33 N.E.2d 241 (N.Y. 1941)
33 N.E.2d 241

Citing Cases

Matter of Sullivan v. Hoberman

den. 259 App. Div. 875, 283 N.Y. 778) the petitioner was inducted and discharged on the day of the Armistice,…

City of New York v. City Civil Service Commission

Veterans' preference cannot be rationally denied to a soldier who served in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air…