From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Donohue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 6, 2000
275 A.D.2d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

September 6, 2000.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1971 and has maintained an office for the practice of law in Albany County.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Paul F. Donohue Jr., Delmar, respondent in person.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


By decision dated March 4, 1998, this Court placed respondent on indefinite suspension from the practice of law but stayed the suspension on various conditions including, among other things, that respondent submit to petitioner quarterly reports from his psychiatrist and his law firm confirming respondent's continuing capacity to practice law (Matter of Donohue, 248 A.D.2d 740).

Petitioner now moves for an order suspending respondent from practice for mental incapacity indefinitely and until further order of this Court (see, 22 NYCRR 806.10 [a]) or, alternatively, for an order extending the prior suspension order. Respondent opposes the motion.

Under the particular circumstances disclosed by the record, we conclude that petitioner's motion should be granted and we suspend respondent from practice indefinitely, unconditionally, and until further order of this Court. Respondent may apply for reinstatement pursuant to this Court's rules (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12) when he can demonstrate that he is no longer incapacitated from practicing law.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Rose, and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is suspended from practice indefinitely, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court, pursuant to this Court's rule ( 22 NYCRR 806.10 [a]); and it is further

ORDERED that, for the period of his suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and he is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules ( 22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys.


Summaries of

Matter of Donohue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 6, 2000
275 A.D.2d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Donohue

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PAUL F. DONOHUE JR., an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 6, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 500

Citing Cases

Matter of Dworsky

Respondent has not replied to the motion. Under the circumstances presented, we grant petitioner's motion and…

In the Matter of Donohue

By decision dated September 6, 2000, this Court suspended respondent from practice indefinitely for mental…