From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Donald M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 9, 1999
263 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

July 9, 1999

Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Bonadio, J. — Juvenile Delinquency.

PRESENT: DENMAN, P.J., LAWTON, HURLBUTT, SCUDDER AND BALIO, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this juvenile delinquency proceeding, Family Court found, based on respondent's admission, that respondent had committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25). Based on evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing, the court additionally found that allowing respondent to remain at home would be contrary to his best interests and contrary to the community's need for protection, and that respondent required the supervision and structured setting that only an "out-of-home placement" would provide. The court therefore placed respondent in the custody of the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months for placement in a "limited secure facility".

In making an order of disposition, Family Court's obligation is to place the juvenile in the "least restrictive" available setting consistent with his or her needs and best interests as well as the need to protect the community ( see, Family Ct Act § 352.2 [a]; Matter of Katherine W., 62 N.Y.2d 947, 948; Matter of Willie J. H., 258 A.D.2d 938 [decided Feb. 10, 1999]). Here, the record as a whole demonstrates that the court carefully considered less restrictive alternatives to placement and properly balanced the needs of respondent and the community's need for protection ( see, Matter of Lloyd L., 246 A.D.2d 651; Matter of Jason W., 207 A.D.2d 495). Placement of respondent in a limited secure facility is justified by respondent's habitual truancy, long-standing behavior problems, criminal activity, penchant for running away, substance abuse, violence and threats of violence against himself and others, special educational needs, and need for counseling and medication ( see, Matter of Shamere M., 259 A.D.2d 423 [decided Mar. 25, 1999]; Matter of Willie J. H., supra; Matter of Lenny V., 247 A.D.2d 919; Matter of Quentin L., 231 A.D.2d 890, 891).


Summaries of

Matter of Donald M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 9, 1999
263 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Donald M

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF DONALD M., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT; MONROE COUNTY ATTORNEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 9, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
695 N.Y.S.2d 459

Citing Cases

Matter of Marsharita K

Family Court did not abuse its discretion in directing respondent's placement with the Office of Children and…