From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Domingo v. Popolizio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 19, 1991
170 A.D.2d 305 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 19, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Edward H. Lehner, J.].


We find substantial evidence in the record to support respondents' determination that petitioner was guilty of several instances of misconduct involving violation of duty regulations and misuse of departmental resources, notwithstanding petitioner's argument that the transcript of the trial contains numerous gaps allegedly caused by inaudibility (Matter of Peterkin v Reid, 105 A.D.2d 707). Our review of the record reveals that the inaudible portions were not so significant as to preclude meaningful review of the proceedings (Matter of Wynter v Jones, 135 A.D.2d 1032, 1034).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Domingo v. Popolizio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 19, 1991
170 A.D.2d 305 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Domingo v. Popolizio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOEL DOMINGO, Petitioner, v. EMANUEL P. POPOLIZIO, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 19, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 305 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)