Opinion
February 19, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Edward H. Lehner, J.].
We find substantial evidence in the record to support respondents' determination that petitioner was guilty of several instances of misconduct involving violation of duty regulations and misuse of departmental resources, notwithstanding petitioner's argument that the transcript of the trial contains numerous gaps allegedly caused by inaudibility (Matter of Peterkin v Reid, 105 A.D.2d 707). Our review of the record reveals that the inaudible portions were not so significant as to preclude meaningful review of the proceedings (Matter of Wynter v Jones, 135 A.D.2d 1032, 1034).
Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.