From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dolan v. Krone

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 9, 1966
218 N.E.2d 900 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Submitted May 2, May 31, 1966

Decided June 9, 1966


Motions by Solomon D. Rosen and William J. Clark for permission to intervene and, as intervenors, to move for amendment of the remittitur herein granted. Motion by James P. Gilligan, Frederick A. Kern and Daniel F. McNamara for leave to intervene and, as intervenors, to move for amendment of the remittitur herein granted. Return of remittitur is requested and, upon return, it will be amended to read as follows: Order reversed, with costs in all courts, for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division and the Civil Service Commission of the State of New York directed to eliminate question 28 from the three examinations in which it appears and to make the essential readjustment in the credit to be given to all examinees for each of the remaining questions. (See Matter of Gruner v. McNamara, 298 N.Y. 395; see, also, Matter of Acosta v. Lang, 13 N.Y.2d 1079, 1081.) No opinion. All concur.

Motion by appellants to vacate all stays of the judgment entered on the decision of the Court of Appeals dated October 21, 1965 denied.


Summaries of

Matter of Dolan v. Krone

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 9, 1966
218 N.E.2d 900 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

Matter of Dolan v. Krone

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANDREW DOLAN et al., Appellants, v. MARY G. KRONE et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 9, 1966

Citations

218 N.E.2d 900 (N.Y. 1966)
218 N.E.2d 900
272 N.Y.S.2d 134

Citing Cases

Matter of Reis v. Hoberman

The ability to perform as a police lieutenant cannot and should not be determined on the basis of whether or…

Matter of Francis v. Colucci

Neither the commission nor the court should devote itself to a determination as to which of four incorrect…