From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Doino v. Laehy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 6, 1984
100 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

March 6, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Denman, Boomer, O'Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, determination confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Judicial review of a penalty imposed by an administrative agency is limited to determining whether the punishment is "`"so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness".' [citations omitted]" ( Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233). In view of the serious nature of petitioner's misconduct, the penalty of dismissal cannot be said to be shocking to one's sense of fairness.


Summaries of

Matter of Doino v. Laehy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 6, 1984
100 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Doino v. Laehy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DONALD DOINO, Respondent, v. GILLMAN J. LAEHY, as General…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 6, 1984

Citations

100 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Matter of Schembeck v. Village Board

The hearing officer found petitioner's version of the accident to be incredible. Since the hearing officer…

Matter of Ross v. Bringewatt

Petitioner's breach resulted in a significant delay in response to a request for assistance. In view of the…