From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Dodd v. Four Sixty-One Eighth Avenue Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 21, 1919
125 N.E. 916 (N.Y. 1919)

Opinion

Argued October 2, 1919

Decided October 21, 1919

William H. Foster and James B. Henry for appellants.

Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CHASE, CARDOZO, POUND and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: HISCOCK, Ch. J., and McLAUGHLIN, J. Absent: HOGAN, J.


Summaries of

Claim of Dodd v. Four Sixty-One Eighth Avenue Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 21, 1919
125 N.E. 916 (N.Y. 1919)
Case details for

Claim of Dodd v. Four Sixty-One Eighth Avenue Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of FLORENCE H. DODD, Respondent, against FOUR…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 21, 1919

Citations

125 N.E. 916 (N.Y. 1919)
227 N.Y. 597

Citing Cases

Matter of Coffey v. New York Steam Company

July, 1921. Award unanimously affirmed on the authority of Dodd v. Four Sixty-One Eighth Avenue Co., Inc. (…