Opinion
November 3, 1989
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The extraordinary remedy of mandamus lies to compel the performance of a purely ministerial act where there is a clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16). Inasmuch as that is not the case in this instance, the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed. Even if we were to consider the instant proceeding as an application for a writ of prohibition, we would deny it (see, Matter of Lipari v Owens, 70 N.Y.2d 731). We note that we have not reached the underlying merits of the petitioner's legal arguments. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Spatt, JJ., concur.