From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Disciplinary Hearing of Curtis Bynes

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 25, 1995
666 A.2d 159 (N.J. 1995)

Opinion

Argued September 11, 1995 —

Decided October 25, 1995.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Jacob Wysoker argued the cause for appellant Curtis Bynes ( Wysoker, Glassner Weingartner, attorneys).

Howard Gran argued the cause for respondent Township of Piscataway Police Department ( Abrams, Blatz, Gran, Hendricks Reina, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the per curiam majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 284 N.J. Super. 489, 665 A.2d 1112 (1994).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

Matter of Disciplinary Hearing of Curtis Bynes

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 25, 1995
666 A.2d 159 (N.J. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Disciplinary Hearing of Curtis Bynes

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING OF CURTIS BYNES, PISCATAWAY…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 25, 1995

Citations

666 A.2d 159 (N.J. 1995)
666 A.2d 159