From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dingfeldt v. Albee Godfrey Whale Creek Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 2, 1937
273 N.Y. 527 (N.Y. 1937)

Opinion

Submitted March 1, 1937

Decided March 2, 1937


Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following:

"A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon by this Court. The appellants contended that the subject of the cause was maritime and within the exclusive admiralty jurisdiction of the United States by virtue of Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution of the United States and of Section 24, Clause 3 and of Section 256 of the United States Judicial Code, U.S.C. Title 28, Sections 31 and 371, and that the provisions of the New York Workmen's Compensation Law, Chapter 615 of the Laws of 1922, and the amendments thereto are not applicable.

"This Court held that the Workmen's Compensation Law of the State of New York applied, that the Federal Courts did not have exclusive jurisdiction to afford relief and that the accident did arise out of and in the course of the decedent's employment." (See 272 N.Y. 623.)


Summaries of

Matter of Dingfeldt v. Albee Godfrey Whale Creek Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 2, 1937
273 N.Y. 527 (N.Y. 1937)
Case details for

Matter of Dingfeldt v. Albee Godfrey Whale Creek Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of FRANCES DINGFELDT, Respondent, against ALBEE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 2, 1937

Citations

273 N.Y. 527 (N.Y. 1937)