From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dineen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 24, 1980
409 N.E.2d 939 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued May 30, 1980

Decided June 24, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Grace A. Brannigan and Paul S. Shemin of counsel), for appellant.

David W. Larrison and Robert A. Small for Eagan Real Estate, Inc., respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board should be reinstated.

There was substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the referee, affirmed by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, that Dineen was an employee rather than an independent contractor. There was evidence that it was a matter of choice with the individual salesman (rather than the employer) whether he be treated as an "employee" or an "independent contractor", and that the substantial differences in treatment after the choice was made were in tax and profit sharing consequences rather than in the amenability of the salesman to the employer's direction.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of Dineen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 24, 1980
409 N.E.2d 939 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Matter of Dineen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOHN W. DINEEN, Respondent. EAGAN REAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 24, 1980

Citations

409 N.E.2d 939 (N.Y. 1980)
409 N.E.2d 939
431 N.Y.S.2d 465

Citing Cases

Matter of McCabe Willig Realty, Inc.

The salespersons work as much or as little as they wish and are not required to account for their time in any…

Matter of Kings Organization Associates

The fact remains, however, that KOA agrees to supply a sales service to builders and then contracts with…