Opinion
May 25, 1983
Appeal from the Erie County Family Court, Sedita, J.
Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Moule, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: There is insufficient evidence to sustain the adjudication that respondent is a person in need of supervision ( Matter of David N., 92 A.D.2d 739; Matter of Freeman B., 93 A.D.2d 997). Neither petitioner (respondent's foster mother) nor the respondent testified. The only evidence concerning respondent's conduct was a partial admission from the Law Guardian that respondent has been guilty of curfew violations. This "admission" from one who has no personal knowledge of the facts cannot serve as legally competent evidence sufficient to prove the acts complained of beyond a reasonable doubt (see Family Ct Act, § 744, subds [a], [b]).