From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Di Stefano v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 13, 1986
116 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

January 13, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J.).


Order affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The case law interpreting the statutory provision at issue here, Village Law § 7-728, as well as the similar provision found in Town Law § 276, makes clear that where the only objection to certification is the plat's failure to comply with zoning ordinances, a plat submitted for final approval is nonetheless entitled to a certificate deeming it approved by default, as a matter of law, if it is not acted upon within the statutorily prescribed time limits (see, Matter of Northern Operating Corp. v Chamberlain, 34 A.D.2d 686, affd 31 N.Y.2d 704; Matter of Fishman v Arnzen, 29 A.D.2d 954; Matter of Scarsdale Meadows v Smith, 20 A.D.2d 906; see also, Matter of Sun Beach Real Estate Dev. Corp. v Anderson, 98 A.D.2d 367, 369, affd 62 N.Y.2d 965). Gibbons, J.P., Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Di Stefano v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 13, 1986
116 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Di Stefano v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTONIO DI STEFANO, Respondent, v. WILLIAM C. MILLER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 13, 1986

Citations

116 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Matter of Pateman v. Marra

The minutes which state "that the matter not be considered" are unequivocal and cannot be interpreted as…

Friends Academy v. Superintendent of Division of Building of Oyster Bay

We agree. In construing statutory provisions similar to Code of the Town of Oyster Bay § 23-11 (F) (5), the…