From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Di Paolo v. Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1916
219 N.Y. 580 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Submitted October 9, 1916

Decided October 24, 1916

George A. Blauvelt, Francis J. MacIntyre and Maurice J. O'Callaghan for appellants.

Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and CARDOZO, JJ. Dissenting: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J.


Summaries of

Claim of Di Paolo v. Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1916
219 N.Y. 580 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Claim of Di Paolo v. Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of GUISEPPA DI PAOLO et al., Respondents…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1916

Citations

219 N.Y. 580 (N.Y. 1916)
114 N.E. 1065

Citing Cases

Pallocco v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.

It has been held that an employee in coming to or going from his work in which he was immediately to engage…