In Matter of Di Donato v. Rosenberg (221 A.D. 624), VAN KIRK, J., speaking for a unanimous court, said: "The statute should be liberally construed in favor of the beneficiary.
Summary of this case from Tosti v. SbanoNovember, 1928.
Present — Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hasbrouck, JJ.
Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.
In Matter of Di Donato v. Rosenberg (221 A.D. 624), VAN KIRK, J., speaking for a unanimous court, said: "The statute should be liberally construed in favor of the beneficiary.
Summary of this case from Tosti v. SbanoFull title:In the Matter of the Claim of NUNZIATO DI DONATO, Respondent, against…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1928
'" ( Surace v. Danna, 248 N.Y. 18, 22.) In Matter of Di Donato v. Rosenberg ( 221 A.D. 624), VAN KIRK, J.,…
Puleo v. ArnoneThe defendants' agreement to the stipulation was apparently based upon the erroneous conclusion that Arnone's…