Summary
holding that even though an attorney had enhanced the value of a realty by obtaining removal of an onerous zoning restriction, that enhancement was not the subject of a charging lien since there was nothing recovered or created by the attorney's effort to which the lien could attach
Summary of this case from Drezin v. DelisserOpinion
Argued September 27, 1972
Decided October 5, 1972
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, HAROLD R. SODEN, J.
Stephen M. Kiernan for appellant.
Daniel D. Mead for respondent.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.