From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Demchik v. Hannigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1133 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 24, 1992

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Balio, Boehm and Davis, JJ.


Determination unanimously annulled on the law without costs and petition granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioner was notified that his pistol permit was being reviewed and that an appointment was being made for him to meet with the pistol licensing officer. Petitioner appeared alone, and, at the end of the appointment, his pistol permit was revoked. The notification to petitioner was insufficient to inform him that his permit might be revoked, and he was not given the opportunity to prepare a meaningful defense. In these circumstances, petitioner was denied due process (see, Matter of St.-Oharra v Colucci, 67 A.D.2d 1104). However, the Niagara County Pistol Permit Office may, if so advised, commence a new proceeding.


Summaries of

Matter of Demchik v. Hannigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1133 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Demchik v. Hannigan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHARLES W. DEMCHIK, Petitioner, v. CHARLES J. HANNIGAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 1133 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
583 N.Y.S.2d 334

Citing Cases

Maye v. Dwyer

"Although conflicting testimony was presented at the hearing, we cannot say that the testimony found credible…

Matter of Dixie v. Mulroy

Memorandum: We reject respondent's contention that this proceeding was not timely commenced. Petitioner was…