From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Delvalle v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 10, 1992
188 A.D.2d 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 10, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Washington County.


Initially, we reject petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer was required to assess the reliability of the confidential informant who told correction authorities that petitioner had used drugs. The positive results of two drug tests provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt of using a controlled substance (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 N.Y.2d 135). Because the confidential information which served as the predicate for the tests was neither relied upon nor relevant to the determination of guilt, there was no need to independently confirm the reliability of the informant (see, Matter of Grochulski v Kuhlmann, 176 A.D.2d 1111, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 755).

We also find no merit in petitioner's contention that the failure to provide certain requested documents requires annulment of the determination. Of the documents requested, no unusual incident report existed (see, Matter of Serrano v Coughlin, 152 A.D.2d 790). The quarterly proficiency reports were not probative (see, Matter of Lewis v Coughlin, 172 A.D.2d 889). Nor were the reagent vial lot numbers, the test operators' time cards or the operators' certifications shown to be probative. In any event, documentary evidence indicated the expiration date of the reagents used, the time and date of the tests and names of the test operators. Two correction officers testified that they conducted the tests at issue and were certified to do so, that the proper testing procedures were followed and that the reagents did not appear discolored. This testimony negated any possible prejudice to petitioner from the denial of these documents (see, Matter of Ruiz v Coughlin, 184 A.D.2d 818). Finally, the urinalysis forms in the record are sufficient to establish a chain of custody for the specimens at issue (see, Matter of Berrios v Kuhlmann, 143 A.D.2d 475, 477). We have considered petitioner's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Yesawich Jr., J.P., Levine, Crew III, Mahoney and Harvey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Delvalle v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 10, 1992
188 A.D.2d 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Delvalle v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAY DELVALLE, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 89

Citing Cases

Shepherd v. Fischer

d misbehavior reports, the testimony at the hearing, the drug test results and the documentary evidence…

Shepherd v. Fischer

In response to petitioner's voluminous request for documentation, the Hearing Officer adjourned the hearing…